Re: [patch 18/95] lib/list_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:53:10PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:02 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > Don't send me any more rename patches until your tools can actually do renames.

> My other thought is that this sort of patchset really makes more sense
> to push through the kselftest/kunit branch anyway, as all of the
> changes were really more KUnit related than anything else. Does it
> make sense to re-submit this that way?

I think it makes sense because this is driven by rules set up by kselftest/kunit.
My main concern here is to have cmdline_kunit in the tree (it is a new file).
Renaming is up to you, I just wanted to be consistent with names and KUnit
documentation.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux