On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:43 PM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:55:18AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > The free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage() which indicate that how many vmemmap
> > pages associated with a HugeTLB page that can be freed to the buddy
> > allocator just returns zero now, because all infrastructure is not
> > ready. Once all the infrastructure is ready, we will rework this
> > function to support the feature.
>
> I would reword the above to:
>
> "free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(), which indicates how many vmemmap
> pages associated with a HugeTLB page can be freed, returns zero for
> now, which means the feature is disabled.
> We will enable it once all the infrastructure is there."
Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> Or something along those lines.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Overall this looks good to me, and it has seen a considerable
> simplification, which is good.
> Some nits/questions below:
>
>
> > +#define vmemmap_hpage_addr_end(addr, end) \
> > +({ \
> > + unsigned long __boundary; \
> > + __boundary = ((addr) + VMEMMAP_HPAGE_SIZE) & VMEMMAP_HPAGE_MASK; \
> > + (__boundary - 1 < (end) - 1) ? __boundary : (end); \
> > +})
>
> Maybe add a little comment explaining what are you trying to get here.
OK. Will do.
>
> > +/*
> > + * Walk a vmemmap address to the pmd it maps.
> > + */
> > +static pmd_t *vmemmap_to_pmd(unsigned long addr)
> > +{
> > + pgd_t *pgd;
> > + p4d_t *p4d;
> > + pud_t *pud;
> > + pmd_t *pmd;
> > +
> > + pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> > + if (pgd_none(*pgd))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
> > + if (p4d_none(*p4d))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
> > + if (pud_none(*pud))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> > + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return pmd;
> > +}
>
> I saw that some people suggested to put all the non-hugetlb vmemmap
> functions under sparsemem-vmemmap.c, which makes some sense if some
> feature is going to re-use this code somehow. (I am not sure if the
> recent patches that take advantage of this feature for ZONE_DEVICE needs
> something like this).
>
> I do not have a strong opinion on this though.
Yeah, I also thought about this. I prefer moving the common code to
the sparsemem-vmemmap.c. If more people agree with this, I can do
this in the next version. :)
>
> > +static void vmemmap_reuse_pte_range(struct page *reuse, pte_t *pte,
> > + unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > + struct list_head *vmemmap_pages)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Make the tail pages are mapped with read-only to catch
> > + * illegal write operation to the tail pages.
> > + */
> > + pgprot_t pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO;
> > + pte_t entry = mk_pte(reuse, pgprot);
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > +
> > + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(pte_none(*pte));
>
> If it is none, page will be NULL and we will crash in the list_add
> below?
Yeah, I think that here should be a BUG_ON.
>
> > +static void vmemmap_remap_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> > + struct list_head *vmemmap_pages)
> > +{
> > + pmd_t *pmd;
> > + unsigned long next, addr = start;
> > + struct page *reuse = NULL;
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, PAGE_SIZE));
> > + VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, PAGE_SIZE));
> > + VM_BUG_ON((start >> PUD_SHIFT) != (end >> PUD_SHIFT));
> This last VM_BUG_ON, is to see if both fall under the same PUD table?
Right.
>
> > +
> > + pmd = vmemmap_to_pmd(addr);
> > + BUG_ON(!pmd);
>
> Which is the criteria you followed to make this BUG_ON and VM_BUG_ON
> in the check from vmemmap_reuse_pte_range?
Indeed, I am somewhat confused. Should be unified. I should use
BUG_ON here and in vmemmap_reuse_pte_range.
>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE L3
--
Yours,
Muchun
