Re: [PATCH v10 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check for SVA features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 07:49:09PM +0000, Krishna Reddy wrote:
> > > Why is BTM mandated for SVA? I couldn't find this requirement in 
> > > SMMU spec (Sorry if I missed it or this got discussed earlier). But 
> > > if performance is the
> > only concern here,
> > > is it better just to allow it with a warning rather than limiting 
> > > SMMUs without
> > BTM?
> >
> > It's a performance concern and requires to support multiple 
> > configurations, but the spec allows it. Are there SMMUs without BTM 
> > that need it?
> 
> The Tegra Next Generation SOC uses arm-smmu-v3, but it doesn't have support for BTM.
> Do you have plan to get your earlier patch to handle invalidate
> notifications into upstream sometime soon? 

Is that a limitation of the SMMU implementation, the interconnect or the
integration?

Will




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux