On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:08:39 +0200 Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew, > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:31:54PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > Without swap, anonymous pages are not scanned. As such, they should > > not count when considering force-scanning a small target if there is > > no swap. > > > > Otherwise, targets are not force-scanned even when their effective > > scan number is zero and the other conditions--kswapd/memcg--apply. > > I forgot to mention, this patch is a fix for '246e87a memcg: fix > get_scan_count() for small targets', which went upstream this merge > window. > > Probably makes sense to merge this one too before the release..? > Ah, I didn't realise that. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>