On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:18:21PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one > > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original > > patchset is consistently performing much better :) > > It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to > assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks! Thank you! Glad that we finally reaches some consensus :) Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>