On Fri 26-08-11 14:03:17, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> >@@ -450,6 +459,10 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> > pr_err("Kill process %d (%s) sharing same memory\n",
> > task_pid_nr(q), q->comm);
> > task_unlock(q);
> >+
> >+ if (frozen(q))
> >+ thaw_process(q);
> >+
>
> We must thaw task strictly after sending SIGKILL.
Sounds reasonable.
> But anyway I think this is a bad idea.
Why?
>
> > force_sig(SIGKILL, q);
> > }
> >
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>