Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:07:50 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20201112221543.3621014-16-guro@fb.com>
References: <20201112221543.3621014-1-guro@fb.com> <20201112221543.3621014-16-guro@fb.com>


> On Nov 12, 2020, at 2:15 PM, Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Account memory used by bpf local storage maps:
> per-socket and per-inode storages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

[...]

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting
  - From: Roman Gushchin
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps
  - From: Roman Gushchin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]