Re: [PATCH 01/13] fs: Use a common define for inode slab caches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:13:07AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:56:14PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > All inode slab cache initialisation calls need to use specific flags
> > so that certain core functionality works correctly (e.g. reclaimable
> > memory accounting). Some of these flags are used inconsistently
> > across different filesystems, so inode cache slab behaviour can vary
> > according to filesystem type.
> > 
> > Wrap all the SLAB_* flags relevant to inode caches up into a single
> > SLAB_INODES flag and convert all the inode caches to use the new
> > flag.
> 
> Why do we keep the SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN flag for some filesystems?

I didn't touch that one, mainly because I think that there are
different reasons for wanting cacheline alignment. e.g. a filesystem
aimed primarily at embedded systms with slow CPUs and little memory
doesn't want to waste memory on cacheline alignment....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]