Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm, page_poison: use static key more efficiently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.11.20 15:37, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 11/11/20 4:38 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.20 16:22, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Commit 11c9c7edae06 ("mm/page_poison.c: replace bool variable with static key")
changed page_poisoning_enabled() to a static key check. However, the function
is not inlined, so each check still involves a function call with overhead not
eliminated when page poisoning is disabled.

Analogically to how debug_pagealloc is handled, this patch converts
page_poisoning_enabled() back to boolean check, and introduces
page_poisoning_enabled_static() for fast paths. Both functions are inlined.

The function kernel_poison_pages() is also called unconditionally and does
the static key check inside. Remove it from there and put it to callers. Also
split it to two functions kernel_poison_pages() and kernel_unpoison_pages()
instead of the confusing bool parameter.

Also optimize the check that enables page poisoning instead of debug_pagealloc
for architectures without proper debug_pagealloc support. Move the check to
init_mem_debugging_and_hardening() to enable a single static key instead of
having two static branches in page_poisoning_enabled_static().

[...]

+ * For use in fast paths after init_mem_debugging() has run, or when a
+ * false negative result is not harmful when called too early.
+ */
+static inline bool page_poisoning_enabled_static(void)
+{
+	return (static_branch_unlikely(&_page_poisoning_enabled));

As already mentioned IIRC:

Yes, it was, and I thought I fixed it. Guess not.

return static_branch_unlikely(&_page_poisoning_enabled);

+}

@@ -1260,7 +1271,8 @@ static __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
   	if (want_init_on_free())
   		kernel_init_free_pages(page, 1 << order);
- kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
+	if (page_poisoning_enabled_static())
+		kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order);

This would look much better by having kernel_poison_pages() simply be
implemented in a header, where the static check is performed.

Take a look at how it's handled in mm/shuffle.h
Ok. Fixup below.

----8<----

  From 7ce26ba61296f583f0f9089e7887f07424f25d2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:20:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm, page_poison: use static key more efficiently-fix

Non-functional cleanups, per David Hildenbrand.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
---
   include/linux/mm.h | 16 +++++++++++++---
   mm/page_alloc.c    |  7 +++----
   mm/page_poison.c   |  4 ++--
   3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 4d6dd9f44571..861b9392b5dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2867,8 +2867,8 @@ extern int apply_to_existing_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
extern void init_mem_debugging_and_hardening(void);
   #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING
-extern void kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages);
-extern void kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages);
+extern void __kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages);
+extern void __kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages);
   extern bool _page_poisoning_enabled_early;
   DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(_page_poisoning_enabled);
   static inline bool page_poisoning_enabled(void)
@@ -2881,7 +2881,17 @@ static inline bool page_poisoning_enabled(void)
    */
   static inline bool page_poisoning_enabled_static(void)
   {
-	return (static_branch_unlikely(&_page_poisoning_enabled));
+	return static_branch_unlikely(&_page_poisoning_enabled);
+}
+static inline void kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages)
+{
+	if (page_poisoning_enabled_static())
+		__kernel_poison_pages(page, numpages);
+}
+static inline void kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages)
+{
+	if (page_poisoning_enabled_static())
+		__kernel_unpoison_pages(page, numpages);
   }
   #else
   static inline bool page_poisoning_enabled(void) { return false; }
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index fd7f9345adc0..1388b5939551 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1271,8 +1271,8 @@ static __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
   	if (want_init_on_free())
   		kernel_init_free_pages(page, 1 << order);
- if (page_poisoning_enabled_static())
-		kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order);
+	kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order);
+
   	/*
   	 * arch_free_page() can make the page's contents inaccessible.  s390
   	 * does this.  So nothing which can access the page's contents should
@@ -2281,8 +2281,7 @@ inline void post_alloc_hook(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
   	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled_static())
   		kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 1);
   	kasan_alloc_pages(page, order);
-	if (page_poisoning_enabled_static())
-		kernel_unpoison_pages(page, 1 << order);
+	kernel_unpoison_pages(page, 1 << order);
   	set_page_owner(page, order, gfp_flags);
   }
diff --git a/mm/page_poison.c b/mm/page_poison.c
index dd7aeada036f..4d75fc9ccc7a 100644
--- a/mm/page_poison.c
+++ b/mm/page_poison.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void poison_page(struct page *page)
   	kunmap_atomic(addr);
   }
-void kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int n)
+void __kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int n)
   {
   	int i;
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void unpoison_page(struct page *page)
   	kunmap_atomic(addr);
   }
-void kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int n)
+void __kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int n)
   {
   	int i;

LGTM.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux