Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:12:45 +0100
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20201105130710.GB16525@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
References: <20201104071308.GN21990@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201104073826.GA15700@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20201104075819.GA10052@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201104084021.GB15700@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20201104085343.GA18718@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201105014028.GA86777@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> <20201105120818.GC21348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <4029c079-b1f3-f290-26b6-a819c52f5200@suse.cz> <20201105125828.GG21348@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20201105130710.GB16525@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>

On Thu 05-11-20 21:07:10, Feng Tang wrote:
[...]
> My debug traces shows it is, and its gfp_mask is 'GFP_KERNEL'

Can you provide the full information please? Which node has been
requested. Which cpuset the calling process run in and which node has
the allocation succeeded from? A bare dump_stack without any further
context is not really helpful.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Feng Tang

References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Feng Tang
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Feng Tang
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Vlastimil Babka
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Michal Hocko
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
  - From: Feng Tang

Prev by Date: [PATCH] mm: account lazily freed anon pages in NR_FILE_PAGES
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm: fix OOMs for binding workloads to movable zone only node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]