Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] slab: provide and use krealloc_array()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:14 AM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 16:20 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Yeah so I had this concern for devm_krealloc() and even sent a patch
> that extended it to honor __GFP_ZERO before I noticed that regular
> krealloc() silently ignores __GFP_ZERO. I'm not sure if this is on
> purpose. Maybe we should either make krealloc() honor __GFP_ZERO or
> explicitly state in its documentation that it ignores it?

And my voice here is to ignore for the same reasons: respect
realloc(3) and making common sense with the idea of REallocating
(capital letters on purpose).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux