On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:48 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:50 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Consider the following memcg hierarchy.
> >
> > root
> > / \
> > A B
> >
> > If we get the objcg of memcg A failed,
>
> Please fix the above statement.
Sorry, could you be more specific, I don't quite understand.
Thanks.
>
> > the get_obj_cgroup_from_current
> > can return the wrong objcg for the root memcg.
> >
> > Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API")
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > changelog in v2:
> > 1. Do not use a comparison with the root_mem_cgroup
> >
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 1337775b04f3..8c8b4c3ed5a0 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2961,6 +2961,7 @@ __always_inline struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_current(void)
> > objcg = rcu_dereference(memcg->objcg);
> > if (objcg && obj_cgroup_tryget(objcg))
> > break;
> > + objcg = NULL;
>
> Roman, in your cleanup, are you planning to have objcg for root memcg as well?
>
> > }
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
--
Yours,
Muchun
