On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:33 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/29/20 1:14 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote: > > With this patch, we will use always the atomic version > > get_nr_swap_pages from now on. Is that ok? I guess so, but it might > > warrant a mention in the changelog? > > I _think_ it's OK. But, you're right that it's a potential behavior > change that's not mentioned in the changelog. > > I'll mention it in the changelog and see if I can dream up any other > practical implications from this change. IMHO, we don't have to modify those two places at all. They are used to rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, so "total_swap_pages" is used instead of checking swappiness and available swap space. The changes may result in imbalanced anon lru. > > Thanks for taking a look! >