On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 08:22:24 -0400 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We could use helper memset to fill the swap_map with SWAP_HAS_CACHE instead
> of a direct loop here to simplify the code. Also we can remove the local
> variable i and map this way.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -975,8 +975,7 @@ static int swap_alloc_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t *slot)
> {
> unsigned long idx;
> struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
> - unsigned long offset, i;
> - unsigned char *map;
> + unsigned long offset;
>
> /*
> * Should not even be attempting cluster allocations when huge
> @@ -996,9 +995,7 @@ static int swap_alloc_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t *slot)
> alloc_cluster(si, idx);
> cluster_set_count_flag(ci, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, CLUSTER_FLAG_HUGE);
>
> - map = si->swap_map + offset;
> - for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++)
> - map[i] = SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
> + memset(si->swap_map + offset, SWAP_HAS_CACHE, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> unlock_cluster(ci);
> swap_range_alloc(si, offset, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> *slot = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
I suppose so. But it does assume that the ->swapmap array has the type
char. If we ever change that, breakage will ensue.
