Hey Dan, On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:38 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:59 PM Nabeel Meeramohideen Mohamed > (nmeeramohide) <nmeeramohide@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > (5) Representing an mpool as a /dev/mpool/<mpool-name> device file provides a > > convenient mechanism for controlling access to and managing the multiple storage > > volumes, and in the future pmem devices, that may comprise an logical mpool. > > Christoph and I have talked about replacing the pmem driver's > dependence on device-mapper for pooling. Was this discussion done publicly or private? If public please share a pointer to the thread. I'd really like to understand the problem statement that is leading to pursuing a pmem native alternative to existing DM. Thanks, Mike
