Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:24:53 -0700
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAHk-=wgDFTqJckA_Na6_qZFMUm3xAu_jvfM7ZRakEAwb0CPSQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHk-=wgkD+sVx3cHAAzhVO5orgksY=7i8q6mbzwBjN0+4XTAUw@mail.gmail.com> <4794a3fa3742a5e84fb0f934944204b55730829b.camel@lca.pw> <CAHk-=wh9Eu-gNHzqgfvUAAiO=vJ+pWnzxkv+tX55xhGPFy+cOw@mail.gmail.com> <20201015151606.GA226448@redhat.com> <20201015195526.GC226448@redhat.com> <CAHk-=wj0vjx0jzaq5Gha-SmDKc3Hnog5LKX0eJZkudBvEQFAUA@mail.gmail.com> <20201016181908.GA282856@redhat.com> <CAHk-=wgDFTqJckA_Na6_qZFMUm3xAu_jvfM7ZRakEAwb0CPSQw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:24 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Looking at that code, I don't see why the page needs to be unlocked [..]

That "unlocked" should be "locked", of course.

            Linus

References:
- [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
  - From: Vivek Goyal
- Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
  - From: Vivek Goyal
- Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
  - From: Vivek Goyal
- Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
  - From: Linus Torvalds

Prev by Date: Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
Next by Date: [PATCH] kasan: adopt KUNIT tests to SW_TAGS mode
Previous by thread: Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
Next by thread: Re: Possible deadlock in fuse write path (Was: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some more lock_page work..)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]