Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: make add_full() condition more explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/20 4:02 AM, wuyun.wu@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.wu@xxxxxxxxxx>

The commit below is incomplete, as it didn't handle the add_full() part.
commit a4d3f8916c65 ("slub: remove useless kmem_cache_debug() before remove_full()")

This patch checks for SLAB_STORE_USER instead of kmem_cache_debug(),
since that should be the only context in which we need the list_lock for
add_full().

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.wu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/slub.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index f226d66408ee..df93a5a0e9a4 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2182,7 +2182,8 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
  		}
  	} else {
  		m = M_FULL;
-		if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && !lock) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
+		if ((s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
  			lock = 1;
  			/*
  			 * This also ensures that the scanning of full
@@ -2191,6 +2192,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
  			 */
  			spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
  		}
+#endif
  	}
if (l != m) {


Hm I missed this, otherwise I would have suggested the following

-----8<-----
From 0b43c7e20c81241f4b74cdb366795fc0b94a25c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:46:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm, slub: use kmem_cache_debug_flags() in deactivate_slab()

Commit 9cf7a1118365 ("mm/slub: make add_full() condition more explicit")
replaced an unnecessarily generic kmem_cache_debug(s) check with an explicit
check of SLAB_STORE_USER and #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.

We can achieve the same specific check with the recently added
kmem_cache_debug_flags() which removes the #ifdef and restores the
no-branch-overhead benefit of static key check when slub debugging is not
enabled.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/slub.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 61d0d2968413..28d78238f31e 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2245,8 +2245,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 		}
 	} else {
 		m = M_FULL;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
-		if ((s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
+		if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
 			lock = 1;
 			/*
 			 * This also ensures that the scanning of full
@@ -2255,7 +2254,6 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 			 */
 			spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
 		}
-#endif
 	}

 	if (l != m) {
--
2.28.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux