Re: [patch 2/2] mm: vmscan: drop nr_force_scan[] from get_scan_count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 12-08-11 08:58:58, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [patch] mm: vmscan: drop nr_force_scan[] from get_scan_count
> 
> The nr_force_scan[] tuple holds the effective scan numbers for anon
> and file pages in case the situation called for a forced scan and the
> regularly calculated scan numbers turned out zero.
> 
> However, the effective scan number can always be assumed to be
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX right before the division into anon and file.  The
> numerators and denominator are properly set up for all cases, be it
> force scan for just file, just anon, or both, to do the right thing.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nice. The code is much easier to read.
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]