On Tue 09-08-11 19:09:33, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> memcg :avoid node fallback scan if possible.
>
> Now, try_to_free_pages() scans all zonelist because the page allocator
> should visit all zonelists...but that behavior is harmful for memcg.
> Memcg just scans memory because it hits limit...no memory shortage
> in pased zonelist.
>
> For example, with following unbalanced nodes
>
> Node 0 Node 1
> File 1G 0
> Anon 200M 200M
>
> memcg will cause swap-out from Node1 at every vmscan.
>
> Another example, assume 1024 nodes system.
> With 1024 node system, memcg will visit 1024 nodes
> pages per vmscan... This is overkilling.
>
> This is why memcg's victim node selection logic doesn't work
> as expected.
>
> This patch is a help for stopping vmscan when we scanned enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
OK, I see the point. At first I was afraid that we would make a bigger
pressure on the node which triggered the reclaim but as we are selecting
t dynamically (mem_cgroup_select_victim_node) - round robin at the
moment - it should be fair in the end. More targeted node selection
should be even more efficient.
I still have a concern about resize_limit code path, though. It uses
memcg direct reclaim to get under the new limit (assuming it is lower
than the current one).
Currently we might reclaim nr_nodes * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX while
after your change we have it at SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. This means that
mem_cgroup_resize_mem_limit might fail sooner on large NUMA machines
(currently it is doing 5 rounds of reclaim before it gives up). I do not
consider this to be blocker but maybe we should enhance
mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim with a nr_pages argument to tell it how
much we want to reclaim (min(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, nr_pages)).
What do you think?
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> Index: mmotm-Aug3/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-Aug3.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ mmotm-Aug3/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2124,6 +2124,16 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, s
> }
>
> shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
> + if (!scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
> + /*
> + * When we do scan for memcg's limit, it's bad to do
> + * fallback into more node/zones because there is no
> + * memory shortage. We quit as much as possible when
> + * we reache target.
> + */
> + if (sc->nr_to_reclaim <= sc->nr_reclaimed)
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>