Re: [PATCH 3/9] mm, page_alloc: remove setup_pageset()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/5/20 2:59 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 22-09-20 16:37:06, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
We initialize boot-time pagesets with setup_pageset(), which sets high and
batch values that effectively disable pcplists.

We can remove this wrapper if we just set these values for all pagesets in
pageset_init(). Non-boot pagesets then subsequently update them to the proper
values.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 26069c8d1b19..76c2b4578723 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5823,7 +5823,7 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
  * not check if the processor is online before following the pageset pointer.
  * Other parts of the kernel may not check if the zone is available.
  */
-static void setup_pageset(struct per_cpu_pageset *p);
+static void pageset_init(struct per_cpu_pageset *p);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct per_cpu_pageset, boot_pageset);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct per_cpu_nodestat, boot_nodestats);
@@ -5891,7 +5891,7 @@ build_all_zonelists_init(void)
 	 * (a chicken-egg dilemma).
 	 */
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
-		setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu));
+		pageset_init(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu));
mminit_verify_zonelist();
 	cpuset_init_current_mems_allowed();
@@ -6210,12 +6210,15 @@ static void pageset_init(struct per_cpu_pageset *p)
 	pcp = &p->pcp;
 	for (migratetype = 0; migratetype < MIGRATE_PCPTYPES; migratetype++)
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcp->lists[migratetype]);
-}
-static void setup_pageset(struct per_cpu_pageset *p)
-{
-	pageset_init(p);
-	pageset_update(&p->pcp, 0, 1);
+	/*
+	 * Set batch and high values safe for a boot pageset. A true percpu
+	 * pageset's initialization will update them subsequently. Here we don't
+	 * need to be as careful as pageset_update() as nobody can access the
+	 * pageset yet.

Isn't this slightly misleading? pageset_init is called from setup_zone_pageset
which is called from the memory hotplug as well. Isn't this more about

It is.

early zone initialization rather than boot pagesets? Or am I misreading
the patch?

It's for boot pagesets (call from build_all_zonelists_init()) that we need these particular values (well, just high = 0). For early zone initialization during hotplug the values don't matter as the caller is setup_zone_pageset() who immediately replaces the values by zone_set_pageset_high_and_batch(). Which is what the comment tries to say.

+	 */
+	pcp->high = 0;
+	pcp->batch = 1;
 }
/*
--
2.28.0






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux