Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-28 15:37:41) > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests into > > two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from > > drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > I think a simple course of action might be to start including drm-intel-gt-next > > in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add > > extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so. > > > > Which specific patches are missing in this case? > > The two dependencies required by my series not in mainline are: > > drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vmap for highmem on x86-32 > drm/i915/gem: Prevent using pgprot_writecombine() if PAT is not supported > > so it has to be one or both of those. Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge window around -rc5 already. But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send to Dave? Regards, Joonas
