On 29.09.20 11:18, Wei Yang wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 08:21:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Page isolation doesn't actually touch the pages, it simply isolates >> pageblocks and moves all free pages to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE freelist. >> >> We already place pages to the tail of the freelists when undoing >> isolation via __putback_isolated_page(), let's do it in any case >> (e.g., if order <= pageblock_order) and document the behavior. >> >> Add a "to_tail" parameter to move_freepages_block() but introduce a >> a new move_to_free_list_tail() - similar to add_to_free_list_tail(). s/a a/a/ >> >> This change results in all pages getting onlined via online_pages() to >> be placed to the tail of the freelist. >> >> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++-- >> mm/page_alloc.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> mm/page_isolation.c | 12 +++++++++--- >> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h >> index 572458016331..3eca9b3c5305 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h >> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h >> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype) >> struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >> int migratetype, int flags); >> void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype); >> -int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >> - int migratetype, int *num_movable); >> +int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype, >> + bool to_tail, int *num_movable); >> >> /* >> * Changes migrate type in [start_pfn, end_pfn) to be MIGRATE_ISOLATE. >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> index 9e3ed4a6f69a..d5a5f528b8ca 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> @@ -905,6 +905,15 @@ static inline void move_to_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, >> list_move(&page->lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]); >> } >> >> +/* Used for pages which are on another list */ >> +static inline void move_to_free_list_tail(struct page *page, struct zone *zone, >> + unsigned int order, int migratetype) >> +{ >> + struct free_area *area = &zone->free_area[order]; >> + >> + list_move_tail(&page->lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]); >> +} >> + > > Would it be better to pass the *to_tail* to move_to_free_list(), so we won't > have a new function? Hi, thanks for the review! See discussion in RFC + cover letter: "Add a "to_tail" parameter to move_freepages_block() but introduce a new move_to_free_list_tail() - similar to add_to_free_list_tail()."