On 9/28/20 12:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > My problem is that I fully agree what you say in your description but > disagree on that EMODPE should not be mentioned. I'll just be very clear: I'm not willing to ack any patch with a changelog that has more than a passing mention of EMODPE. Do what you think is best, but if sticking to your guns may deplete the pool of folks willing to ack your patch.
