dump_unreclaimable_slab() acquires the slab_mutex first,
and it won't remove any slab_caches list entry when
itering the slab_caches lists.
Thus, we do not need list_for_each_entry_safe here,
which is against removal of list entry.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
---
mm/slab_common.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index f9ccd5dc13f3..0cd2821b7066 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int slab_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
void dump_unreclaimable_slab(void)
{
- struct kmem_cache *s, *s2;
+ struct kmem_cache *s;
struct slabinfo sinfo;
/*
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ void dump_unreclaimable_slab(void)
pr_info("Unreclaimable slab info:\n");
pr_info("Name Used Total\n");
- list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, &slab_caches, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list) {
if (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
continue;
--
2.25.1
