Re: [PATCH v3 30/39] arm64: kasan: Enable TBI EL1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/25/20 12:37 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:37AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> index 12ba98bc3b3f..dce06e553c7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>> @@ -40,9 +40,13 @@
>>  #define TCR_CACHE_FLAGS	TCR_IRGN_WBWA | TCR_ORGN_WBWA
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
>> -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
>> +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
>>  #else
>> -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS 0
>> +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS 0
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
>> +#define TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -454,6 +458,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
>>  
>>  	/* set the TCR_EL1 bits */
>>  	orr	mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
>> +	orr	mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS
>> +#endif
> 
> I missed this in an earlier patch. Do we need TCMA1 set without
> KASAN_HW? If not, we could add them both to TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS.
> 

We don't. I will move the code around in the next version.

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux