On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:33AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > index 991dd5f031e4..c7fff8daf2a7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -200,13 +200,36 @@ do { \ > CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)); \ > } while (0) > > +/* > + * The Tag Check Flag (TCF) mode for MTE is per EL, hence TCF0 > + * affects EL0 and TCF affects EL1 irrespective of which TTBR is > + * used. > + * The kernel accesses TTBR0 usually with LDTR/STTR instructions > + * when UAO is available, so these would act as EL0 accesses using > + * TCF0. > + * However futex.h code uses exclusives which would be executed as > + * EL1, this can potentially cause a tag check fault even if the > + * user disables TCF0. > + * > + * To address the problem we set the PSTATE.TCO bit in uaccess_enable() > + * and reset it in uaccess_disable(). > + * > + * The Tag check override (TCO) bit disables temporarily the tag checking > + * preventing the issue. > + */ > static inline void uaccess_disable(void) > { > + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(0), > + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); > + > __uaccess_disable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); > } > > static inline void uaccess_enable(void) > { > + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_TCO(1), > + ARM64_MTE, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)); > + > __uaccess_enable(ARM64_HAS_PAN); > } This look fine. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > index a3bd189602df..d110f382dacf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > #include <asm/debug-monitors.h> > #include <asm/esr.h> > #include <asm/kprobes.h> > +#include <asm/mte.h> > #include <asm/processor.h> > #include <asm/sysreg.h> > #include <asm/system_misc.h> > @@ -294,6 +295,11 @@ static void die_kernel_fault(const char *msg, unsigned long addr, > do_exit(SIGKILL); > } > > +static void report_tag_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > + struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > +} Do we need to introduce report_tag_fault() in this patch? It's fine but add a note in the commit log that it will be populated in a subsequent patch. > + > static void __do_kernel_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > struct pt_regs *regs) > { > @@ -641,10 +647,40 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) > return 0; > } > > +static void do_tag_recovery(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, > + struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + static bool reported = false; > + > + if (!READ_ONCE(reported)) { > + report_tag_fault(addr, esr, regs); > + WRITE_ONCE(reported, true); > + } I don't mind the READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE here but not sure what they help with. -- Catalin