Re: [PATCH -mmotm 1/2] fault-injection: improve naming of public function should_fail()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/8/1 Per Forlin <per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> rename fault injection function should_fail() to fault_should_fail()

fault_should_fail sounds tautological.
fault_should_inject() is better, but I'm not sure.
Should we retain the naming issue and go forward to merge mmc fault
injection first?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]