On 9/18/20 10:36 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> Same as above but I will use the orr in the next version. > I wonder whether system_supports_mte() makes more sense here than the > alternative: > > if (!system_supports_mte()) > return 0xff; > > ... mte irg stuff ... > > (you could do the same for the mte_get_mem_tag() function) > This would have been my preference from the beginning but then you mentioned alternatives ;) Anyway, more then happy to change the code in this way, seems more clean and easy to understand. -- Regards, Vincenzo
