On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:46:59PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Yu Zhao wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I see you have taken this: > > mm: use add_page_to_lru_list()/page_lru()/page_off_lru() > > Do you mind dropping it? > > > > Michal asked to do a bit of additional work. So I thought I probably > > should create a series to do more cleanups I've been meaning to. > > > > This series contains the change in the patch above and goes a few > > more steps farther. It's intended to improve readability and should > > not have any performance impacts. There are minor behavior changes in > > terms of debugging and error reporting, which I have all highlighted > > in the individual patches. All patches were properly tested on 5.8 > > running Chrome OS, with various debug options turned on. > > > > Michal, > > > > Do you mind taking a looking at the entire series? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Yu Zhao (13): > > mm: use add_page_to_lru_list() > > mm: use page_off_lru() > > mm: move __ClearPageLRU() into page_off_lru() > > mm: shuffle lru list addition and deletion functions > > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to lru list addition functions > > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to trace_mm_lru_insertion() > > mm: don't pass enum lru_list to del_page_from_lru_list() > > mm: rename page_off_lru() to __clear_page_lru_flags() > > mm: inline page_lru_base_type() > > mm: VM_BUG_ON lru page flags > > mm: inline __update_lru_size() > > mm: make lruvec_lru_size() static > > mm: enlarge the int parameter of update_lru_size() > > > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 14 ++-- > > include/linux/mm_inline.h | 115 ++++++++++++++------------------- > > include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 - > > include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 +- > > include/trace/events/pagemap.h | 11 ++-- > > mm/compaction.c | 2 +- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +-- > > mm/mlock.c | 2 +- > > mm/swap.c | 53 ++++++--------- > > mm/vmscan.c | 28 +++----- > > 10 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog > > Sorry, Yu, I may be out-of-line in sending this: but as you know, > Alex Shi has a long per-memcg lru_lock series playing in much the > same area (particularly conflicting in mm/swap.c and mm/vmscan.c): > a patchset that makes useful changes, that I'm very keen to help > into mmotm a.s.a.p (but not before I've completed diligence). > > We've put a lot of effort into its testing, I'm currently reviewing > it patch by patch (my general silence indicating that I'm busy on that, > but slow as ever): so I'm a bit discouraged to have its stability > potentially undermined by conflicting cleanups at this stage. > > If there's general agreement that your cleanups are safe and welcome > (Michal's initial reaction sheds some doubt on that), great: I hope > that Andrew can fast-track them into mmotm, then Alex rebase on top > of them, and I then re-test and re-review. > > But if that quick agreement is not forthcoming, may I ask you please > to hold back, and resend based on top of Alex's next posting? The per-memcg lru lock series seems a high priority, and I have absolutely no problem accommodate your request. In return, may I ask you or Alex to review this series after you have finished with per-memcg lru lock (to make sure that I resolve all the conflicts correctly at least)?
