Re: [PATCH v2 31/37] kasan, x86, s390: update undef CONFIG_KASAN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:16PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
[...]
>  arch/s390/boot/string.c         | 1 +
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/string.c b/arch/s390/boot/string.c
> index b11e8108773a..faccb33b462c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/boot/string.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/boot/string.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #undef CONFIG_KASAN
> +#undef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC

Is CONFIG_KASAN still used to guard instrumented versions of functions?

It looks like #undef CONFIG_KASAN is no longer needed -- at least
<linux/string.h> no longer mentions it.

>  #include "../lib/string.c"
>  
>  int strncmp(const char *cs, const char *ct, size_t count)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> index 726e264410ff..2ac973983a8e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #undef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
>  #undef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
>  #undef CONFIG_KASAN
> +#undef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC

Similar here; although it seems a little harder to check if CONFIG_KASAN
is still needed. (Maybe could check the preprocessed output diffs?)

>  
>  /* cpu_feature_enabled() cannot be used this early */
>  #define USE_EARLY_PGTABLE_L5
> -- 
> 2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux