Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: correct the comment of mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed 16-09-20 09:19:27, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Since commit fb2a6fc56be6 ("mm: memcg: rework and document OOM waiting 
>> and wakeup"), we have renamed mem_cgroup_oom_lock to 
>> mem_cgroup_oom_trylock. So replace mem_cgroup_oom_lock with mem_cgroup_oom_trylock in comment.
>
>While you are right I find the comment more confusing then helpful.
>What does it try to tell us actually? Is it still valid? Shouldn't we rather remove it or make it more clear?
>> 

It seems this comment no long make sense. Many thanks for your nice advise.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux