On 9/15/20 9:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:02:04PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c >> @@ -383,25 +383,34 @@ postcore_initcall(atomic_pool_init); >> struct dma_contig_early_reserve { >> phys_addr_t base; >> unsigned long size; >> + struct list_head areas; >> }; >> >> +static __initdata LIST_HEAD(dma_mmu_remap_areas); >> >> void __init dma_contiguous_early_fixup(phys_addr_t base, unsigned long size) >> { >> + struct dma_contig_early_reserve *d; >> + >> + d = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct dma_contig_early_reserve), >> + sizeof(void *)); >> + if (!d) { >> + pr_err("Unable to allocate dma_contig_early_reserve struct!\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + d->base = base; >> + d->size = size; >> + list_add_tail(&d->areas, &dma_mmu_remap_areas); >> } > > I wonder if struct cma should grow a flags or type field, so that the > arm code can simply use cma_for_each_area to iterate the CMA areas for > the DMA fixup, and we can remove the extra list and the magic hook. I will look into a way of doing that. > >> +/* modify here */ >> +LIST_HEAD(cma_areas); > > What does this comment mean? Sorry, that might have been a note to myself that was accidentally left. > >> +static unsigned int cma_area_count; > > It seems this is only used to provide a default name for the CMA > areas, but all areas actually provide a name, so I think we can drop > the default naming and the cma_area_count variable entirely. > Seems reasonable. We can change behavior to require a name. >> if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> + >> /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */ > > This adds a spurious empty line. yes, my bad. >> static int __init cma_debugfs_init(void) >> { >> struct dentry *cma_debugfs_root; >> - int i; >> + struct cma *c; >> >> cma_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("cma", NULL); >> >> - for (i = 0; i < cma_area_count; i++) >> - cma_debugfs_add_one(&cma_areas[i], cma_debugfs_root); >> + list_for_each_entry(c, &cma_areas, areas) >> + cma_debugfs_add_one(c, cma_debugfs_root); > > I think this should use cma_for_each_area, that way cma_areas can be > keep static in cma.c. Yes, will provide a cma_for_each_area routine. -- Mike Kravetz