Re: [NEEDS-REVIEW] Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/14/2020 7:50 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 9/11/20 3:59 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
...
Here are the changes if we take the mprotect(PROT_SHSTK) approach.
Any comments/suggestions?

I still don't like it. :)

I'll also be much happier when there's a proper changelog to accompany
this which also spells out the alternatives any why they suck so much.

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
index d4a8d0424bfb..024f006fcfe8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
#define MAP_32BIT 0x40 /* only give out 32bit addresses */ +#define PROT_SHSTK 0x10 /* shadow stack pages */
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
  /*
   * Take the 4 protection key bits out of the vma->vm_flags
@@ -19,13 +21,35 @@
  		((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT2 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) |	\
  		((vm_flags) & VM_PKEY_BIT3 ? _PAGE_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
-#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) ( \
+#define pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) (			\
  		((key) & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) |      \
  		((key) & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0) |      \
  		((key) & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0) |      \
  		((key) & 0x8 ? VM_PKEY_BIT3 : 0))
+#else
+#define pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key)
  #endif

My inner compiler doesn't think this will compile:

	( | shstk_vm_prot_bits(prot))


+#define shstk_vm_prot_bits(prot) ( \
+		(static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) && (prot & PROT_SHSTK)) ? \
+		VM_SHSTK : 0)

Why do you need to filter PROT_SHSTK twice.  Won't the prot passed in
here be filtered by arch_validate_prot()?

X86_FEATURE_SHSTK is already checked by arch_validate_prot() and may be skipped. PROT_SHSTK needs to be tested and translated to VM_SHSTK here.


+#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) \
+		(pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key) | shstk_vm_prot_bits(prot))
+

IMNHO, this is eminently more readable if you do:

#define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, key)	\
		(shstk_vm_prot_bits(prot))	\
		  pkey_vm_prot_bits(prot, key))

BTW, can these be static inlines?  I forget if I had a good reason for
making them #defines.

Probably, at compile time, ((key) & 0x1 ? (VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0) cannot be optimized out, unless there is a #define? Since we are adding the shadow stack stuff, why don't we make it static inline?

Also do we want to check if the cpu has PKEY?

[...]
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index a8edbcb3af99..520bd8caa005 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -571,6 +571,17 @@ static int do_mprotect_pkey(unsigned long start, size_t
len,
  				goto out;
  		}
  	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Only anonymous mapping is suitable for shadow stack.
+	 */

Why?

When a file mapping is turned into shadow stack, then the logic is strange. For instance, when a CALL triggers a shadow stack page fault, do we page in from a file? At least this seems to defeat shadow stack.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux