On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm very confident that slub could beat slab on any system if you throw
> enough memory at it because its fastpaths are extremely efficient, but
> there's no business case for that.
Btw, I haven't measured this recently but in my testing, SLAB has
pretty much always used more memory than SLUB. So 'throwing more
memory at the problem' is definitely a reasonable approach for SLUB.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>