On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 07:20:34AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 8:25 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 08:02:35PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > It is possible that a buggy caller of unpin_user_pages()
> > > (specially in error handling path) may end up calling it with
> > > npages < 0 which is unnecessary.
> > > @@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ void unpin_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
> > > {
> > > unsigned long index;
> > >
> > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(npages < 0))
> > > + return;
> >
> > But npages is unsigned long. So it can't be less than zero.
>
> Sorry, I missed it.
>
> Then, it means if npages is assigned with -ERRNO by caller, unpin_user_pages()
> may end up calling a big loop, which is unnecessary.
How will a caller allocate memory of the right size and still manage
to call with the wrong npages? Do you have an example of a broken caller?
Jason
