Re: [RFC] ARM: dma_map|unmap_sg plus iommu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Friday, July 29, 2011 12:54 PM Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> > > This sounds rather hacky. How about partitioning the address space for
>> > > the device and give the dma-api only a part of it. The other parts can
>> > > be directly mapped using the iommu-api then.
>> >
>> > Well, I'm not convinced that iommu-api should be used by the device drivers
>> > directly. If possible we should rather extend dma-mapping than use such
> hacks.
>>
>> Building this into dma-api would turn it into an iommu-api. The line
>> between the apis are clear. The iommu-api provides direct mapping
>> of bus-addresses to system-addresses while the dma-api puts a memory
>> manager on-top which deals with bus-address allocation itself.
>> So if you want to map bus-addresses directly the iommu-api is the way to
>> go. This is in no way a hack.
>
> The problem starts when you want to use the same driver on two different
> systems:
> one with iommu and one without. Our driver depends only on dma-mapping and the
> fact
> that the first allocation starts from the right address. On systems without
> iommu,
> board code calls bootmem_reserve() and dma_declare_coherent() for the required
> memory range. Systems with IOMMU just sets up device io address space to start
> at the specified address. This works fine, because in our system each device has
> its own, private iommu controller and private address space.
>
> Right now I have no idea how to handle this better. Perhaps with should be
> possible
> to specify somehow the target dma_address when doing memory allocation, but I'm
> not
> really convinced yet if this is really required.
>
What about using 'dma_handle' argument of alloc_coherent callback of
dma_map_ops?
Although it is an output argument, I think we can convey a hint or
start address to map
to the IO memory manager that resides behind dma API.
Of course, it is unable to map a specific physical address with the
dma address with the idea.
I think the problem can be solved for some application
with overriding alloc_coherent callback in the machine initialization code.
Still the above idea cannot answer when a physical address is needed
to be mapped
to a specific dma address with 'dma_map_*()'.

DMA API is so abstract that it cannot cover all requirements by
various device drivers;;

Regards,
Cho KyongHo.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]