On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:16:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:04:33 +0900 > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Test result is following as. > > > > 1) Elapased time 10GB file decompressed. > > Old inorder inorder + pagevec flush[10/10] > > 01:47:50.88 01:43:16.16 01:40:27.18 > > > > 2) failure of inorder lru > > For test, it isolated 375756 pages. Only 45875 pages(12%) are put backed to > > out-of-order(ie, head of LRU) Others, 329963 pages(88%) are put backed to in-order > > (ie, position of old page in LRU). > > I'm getting more and more worried about how complex MM is becoming and > this patchset doesn't take us in a helpful direction :( Hmm. I think it's not too complicated stuff. :( But I understand your concern enoughly. > > But it's hard to argue with numbers like that. Please respin patches 6-10? Of course, but it would be rather late due to my business and other interesting features. I will try to get a new data point in next version. Thanks, Andrew. > > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>