Re: [PATCH v11 6/9] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/3/20 9:09 AM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> If the debugger is going to write an MSR, only in the third case would
> this make a slight sense.  For example, if the system has CET enabled,
> but the task does not have CET enabled, and GDB is writing to a CET MSR.
>  But still, this is strange to me.

If this is strange, then why do we even _implement_ writes?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux