Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/thp: fix __split_huge_pmd_locked() for migration PMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:58:24AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> A migrating transparent huge page has to already be unmapped. Otherwise,
> the page could be modified while it is being copied to a new page and
> data could be lost. The function __split_huge_pmd() checks for a PMD
> migration entry before calling __split_huge_pmd_locked() leading one to
> think that __split_huge_pmd_locked() can handle splitting a migrating PMD.
> However, the code always increments the page->_mapcount and adjusts the
> memory control group accounting assuming the page is mapped.
> Also, if the PMD entry is a migration PMD entry, the call to
> is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd) is incorrect because it calls pmd_pfn(pmd) instead
> of migration_entry_to_pfn(pmd_to_swp_entry(pmd)).
> Fix these problems by checking for a PMD migration entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hm. Could you remind me what codepath splits migration PMD? Maybe it
should wait until migration is complete? We could avoid a lot of
complexity this way.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux