On Wed 02-09-20 16:55:05, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 9/2/20 4:26 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:08 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > Thread#1 - continue > >> > free_unref_page_commit > >> > migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page); > >> > // get old migration type > >> > list_add(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]); > >> > // add new page to already drained pcp list > >> > > >> > Thread#2 > >> > Never drains pcp again, and therefore gets stuck in the loop. > >> > > >> > The fix is to try to drain per-cpu lists again after > >> > check_pages_isolated_cb() fails. > >> > >> But this means that the page is not isolated and so it could be reused > >> for something else. No? > > > > The page is in a movable zone, has zero references, and the section is > > isolated (i.e. set_pageblock_migratetype(page, MIGRATE_ISOLATE);) is > > set. The page should be offlinable, but it is lost in a pcp list as > > that list is never drained again after the first failure to migrate > > all pages in the range. > > Yeah. To answer Michal's "it could be reused for something else" - yes, somebody > could allocate it from the pcplist before we do the extra drain. But then it > becomes "visible again" and the loop in __offline_pages() should catch it by > scan_movable_pages() - do_migrate_range(). And this time the pageblock is > already marked as isolated, so the page (freed by migration) won't end up on the > pcplist again. So the page block is marked MIGRATE_ISOLATE but the allocation itself could be used for non migrateable objects. Or does anything prevent that from happening? We really do depend on isolation to not allow reuse when offlining. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
