[PATCH RFC] mm: reverse lru scanning order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



LRU scanning order was accidentially changed in commit v2.6.27-5584-gb69408e:
"vmscan: Use an indexed array for LRU variables".
Before that commit reclaimer always scan active lists first.

This patch just reverse it back.
This is just notice and question: "Does it affect something?"

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index be1ac8d..88fb49c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ enum lru_list {
 
 #define for_each_lru(l) for (l = 0; l < NR_LRU_LISTS; l++)
 
-#define for_each_evictable_lru(l) for (l = 0; l <= LRU_ACTIVE_FILE; l++)
+#define for_each_evictable_lru(l) \
+	for (l = LRU_ACTIVE_FILE; l >= LRU_INACTIVE_ANON; l--)
 
 static inline int is_file_lru(enum lru_list l)
 {

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]