On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, Alex Shi wrote: > 在 2020/8/31 上午4:57, Hugh Dickins 写道: > > Here's a set of independent fixes against 5.9-rc2: prompted by > > testing Alex Shi's "warning on !memcg" and lru_lock series, but > > I think fit for 5.9 - though maybe only the first for stable. > > > > [PATCH 1/5] ksm: reinstate memcg charge on copied pages > > [PATCH 2/5] mm: migration of hugetlbfs page skip memcg > > [PATCH 3/5] shmem: shmem_writepage() split unlikely i915 THP > > [PATCH 4/5] mm: fix check_move_unevictable_pages() on THP > > [PATCH 5/5] mlock: fix unevictable_pgs event counts on THP > > Hi Hugh, > > Thanks a lot for reporting and fix! All fixed looks fine for me. Thanks for checking. > > BTW, > I assume you already rebased lru_lock patchset on this. So I don't > need to redo rebase again, do I? :) That's right, no need for another posting: the only ones of yours which don't apply cleanly on top of mine are 20/32 and 21/32, touching check_move_unevictable_pages(); and they're easy enough to resolve. With my 5 fixes in, I'll advance to commenting on yours (but not today). Hugh
