On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:20:27 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Fix build errors when CONFIG_ACPI is not set/enabled by adding > <acpi/acpi_numa.h> in the #else (!CONFIG_ACPI) block. > > ../arch/x86/mm/numa.c: In function ‘numa_setup’: > ../arch/x86/mm/numa.c:43:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘disable_srat’; did you mean ‘disable_irq’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > disable_srat(); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../arch/x86/mm/numa.c:45:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘disable_hmat’; did you mean ‘disable_dma’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > disable_hmat(); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > > ... > > --- mmotm-2020-0824-1606.orig/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ mmotm-2020-0824-1606/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -709,6 +709,8 @@ static inline u64 acpi_arch_get_root_poi > #define ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode) (NULL) > #define ACPI_DEVICE_CLASS(_cls, _msk) .cls = (0), .cls_msk = (0), > > +#include <acpi/acpi_numa.h> > + > struct fwnode_handle; > > static inline bool acpi_dev_found(const char *hid) I don't think there's anything in -next that caused this? It's in mainline also?
