On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:29 PM Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/20/20 1:35 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 09:03:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> The mem_cgroup_get_max() function used to get memory+swap max from
> >> both the v1 memsw and v2 memory+swap page counters & return the maximum
> >> of these 2 values. This is redundant and it is more efficient to just
> >> get either the v1 or the v2 values depending on which one is currently
> >> in use.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> index 26b7a48d3afb..d219dca5239f 100644
> >> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >> @@ -1633,17 +1633,13 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >> */
> >> unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >> {
> >> - unsigned long max;
> >> + unsigned long max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >>
> >> - max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> >> if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg)) {
> >> - unsigned long memsw_max;
> >> - unsigned long swap_max;
> >> -
> >> - memsw_max = memcg->memsw.max;
> >> - swap_max = READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> >> - swap_max = min(swap_max, (unsigned long)total_swap_pages);
> >> - max = min(max + swap_max, memsw_max);
> >> + if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> >> + max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> >> + else
> >> + max = memcg->memsw.max;
> > I agree with the premise of the patch, but v1 and v2 have sufficiently
> > different logic, and the way v1 overrides max from the innermost
> > branch again also doesn't help in understanding what's going on.
> >
> > Can you please split out the v1 and v2 code?
> >
> > if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) {
> > max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> > if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg))
> > max += READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.max);
> > } else {
> > if (mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg))
> > max = memcg->memsw.max;
> > else
> > max = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.max);
> > }
> >
> > It's slightly repetitive, but IMO much more readable.
> >
> Sure. That makes it even better.
>
Can you please also add in the commit message why it is ok to drop
total_swap_pages comparison from mem_cgroup_get_max()?
