On Thu 13-08-20 19:09:29, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Thu 13-08-20 16:34:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [...] I will go though the rest of the email tomorrow. > >> Really, if your primary lockless caches are empty then any allocation > >> which comes from deep atomic context should simply always fail. Being > >> stuck in an interrupt handler or even deeper for 200+ microseconds > >> waiting for zone lock is just bonkers IMO. > > > > That would require changing NOWAIT/ATOMIC allocations semantic quite > > drastically for !RT kernels as well. I am not sure this is something we > > can do. Or maybe I am just missing your point. > > I really do not understand why you think that it affects everything. We are likely not on the same page here. Are you talking about the original proposal in this thread (aka a new flag) or a way to reuse existing gfp space (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200813075027.GD9477@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) with a modification that would both silence the lockdep and keep the existing NOWAIT semantic? Sorry bear with me but I am getting lost in this thread. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
