于 2011年07月19日 14:54, Eric Dumazet 写道:
Le mardi 19 juillet 2011 à 14:20 +0800, Cong Wang a écrit :
Hmm, since we don't have to enable SYSFS for NUMA, how about
make a new Kconfig for drivers/base/node.c? I.e., CONFIG_NUMA_SYSFS,
like patch below.
I dont quite understand this patch, nor the idea behind it.
You can have a NUMA kernel (for appropriate percpu locality or whatever
kernel data), and yet user land processes unable to use numactl if SYSFS
is not enabled. I dont see a problem.
Both Pekka and Mel pointed out that it makes sense to have NUMA kernel
without SYSFS, this means sysfs interface is not a must for NUMA kernel.
Thus, I think it makes sense to separate the numa sysfs code out.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>