[PATCH v2 07/17] mircoblaze: drop unneeded NUMA and sparsemem initializations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

microblaze does not support neither NUMA not SPARSMEM, so there is no point
to call memblock_set_node() and sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions()
functions during microblaze memory initialization.

Remove these calls and the surrounding code.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 17 +----------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
index 521b59ba716c..49e0c241f9b1 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c
@@ -105,9 +105,8 @@ static void __init paging_init(void)
 
 void __init setup_memory(void)
 {
-	struct memblock_region *reg;
-
 #ifndef CONFIG_MMU
+	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	u32 kernel_align_start, kernel_align_size;
 
 	/* Find main memory where is the kernel */
@@ -161,20 +160,6 @@ void __init setup_memory(void)
 	pr_info("%s: max_low_pfn: %#lx\n", __func__, max_low_pfn);
 	pr_info("%s: max_pfn: %#lx\n", __func__, max_pfn);
 
-	/* Add active regions with valid PFNs */
-	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
-		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
-
-		start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
-		end_pfn = memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg);
-		memblock_set_node(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				  (end_pfn - start_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT,
-				  &memblock.memory, 0);
-	}
-
-	/* XXX need to clip this if using highmem? */
-	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(0);
-
 	paging_init();
 }
 
-- 
2.26.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux