Re: possible recursive locking detected cache_alloc_refill() + cache_flusharray()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Sebastian Siewior wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> just hit the following with full debuging turned on:
> 
> | =============================================
> | [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> | 3.0.0-rc7-00088-g1765a36 #64
> | ---------------------------------------------
> | udevd/1054 is trying to acquire lock:
> |  (&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<c00bf640>] cache_alloc_refill+0xac/0x868
> |
> | but task is already holding lock:
> |  (&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<c00be47c>] cache_flusharray+0x58/0x148
> |
> | other info that might help us debug this:
> |  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> |
> |        CPU0
> |        ----
> |   lock(&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock);
> |   lock(&(&parent->list_lock)->rlock);

Known problem. Pekka is looking into it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]