Re: NULL poniter dereference in isolate_lru_pages 2.6.39.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That definately fixed it.  MTBF was about 20 days on those systems, since that patch we've had 200 server days with no problems.

Thanks!

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Minchan Kim wrote:

>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:16:09 +0900
>From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: Chris Pearson <pearson.christopher.j@xxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>    Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: NULL poniter dereference in isolate_lru_pages 2.6.39.1
>
>On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Chris Pearson
><pearson.christopher.j@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We applied the patch to many servers.  No problems so far.
>>
>> The .config is attached.
>
>Thanks. I verified. The point where isolate_lru_pages + 0x225 is
>page_count exactly. So Andrea patch solves this problem apparently.
>Couldn't we throw this patch to stable tree?
>
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/857442/
>
>>
>> What's the config option to get that debugging info in the future?
>
>CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO helps you. :)
>
>-- 
>Kind regards,
>Minchan Kim
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]