On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:14:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > With the inode LRUs moving to per-sb structures, there is no longer > a need for a global inode_lru_lock. The locking can be made more > fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU > operations of different filesytsems completely from each other. Btw, any reason this is not done for dcache_lru_lock? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>